Sample Article Review Paper on Executive Summary

The business of the technological expectations has not been fully explored by the scholars who are deeply interested in the tasks of potential and visions in the growth of the new technologies.  Despite this fact, there has been an emergence of intermediaries who have specialized in production, co- modification and selling of the future oriented knowledge, they immensely influenced the shaping of technology and innovations. The intermediaries have focused on the work of the specialist’s form of consultants who are commonly known as the industry analysts, they regard them as the promissory organizations. A promissory organization in this context captures how successful the intermediaries are in organizing expectations within procurement and innovation.

The major goal of the promissory organization is to indicate the major tasks that these actors engage in when shaping the technologies, by doing so they show the complex and an uneven form of influence. It is sometimes uncertain as to why certain kinds of promissory behavior are more influential than the others; to shed light on this issue discussions of the constitutive nature are used. The literature provides a significant, but arguably partial analytical approach for the purpose of articulation of the dynamics and the differences that hovers round the product expectations. Recent developments in economic sociology and the sociology of finance are used by utilizing a theoretical framework that closely relates to the performance of the economic theory. Through the process of contrasting the different types of the promissory work that is done by the industry analysts and different forms of accountability to which the following work is subjected to, a typology that characterize typology behavior is mapped out in regards to the differences in kind and effect.