Sample Paper on the Shame of College Sports

The aspect of corruption is rampant in college sports in various forms such as students bribing sports officials or school management so as to participate in these sports. College sports have been economized in the sense that big football teams are making lots of cash, its however important to observe that even though there are great profits involved, there are vices of tribalism, corruption and other forms of immorality are rampant. It is to the belief of the general public that players with diverse skills sharpen their expertise through training and so it’s important that they receive compensation that match the skills that they possess because these dubious acts decreased their skills affecting the leisure time. At higher compensation rates, additional skill units also can be secured from players newly attracted to the market.

The number of scandals that are experienced in college sports where by the beneficiaries are not the rightful ones as in the case of University of Southern California in which the NCAA found out that Reggie Bush had received free airfare and rides from sports agents with the intend of making him their client. With each scandal proving futile in its own kind the more common impact of these scandals is affecting the main intend of educational institutions which is to enforce sanctity and develop beneficial officials in the society. Researches done to understand the entire issue of college sport scandals have revealed that the athletes in college do not get their intended facilitation as required. The athletes are used as slaves in the sense that they are the ones who do the actual playing but the gains from their great efforts are enjoyed by other individuals who gain from the comfort of their seats.

The one year rule mandated that a student could not participate in intercollegiate athletics until he had completed one year of studies, in good standing, at his university. The rule was proposed as a solution to college athletes jumping from one school to the next, and as a way to stop students from staying in school only until the spring sports had ended. Conferences large and small debated the one year rule, coming to a variety of conclusions about its usefulness. The establishment and revocation of athletic relations happened with almost comedic frequency during this period. The sports historian attempting to track all the athletic feuds between college athletic programs during the Progressive Era would have a near-impossible task.

Most schools today allowed African Americans access to education, but of a variety not exactly matching that of a full-fledged university. The curriculum at black serving institutions usually focused on preparing teachers and spanned two years rather than four. Contemporaries of the normal schools referred to the focus of the black colleges as “industrial,” and many race reformers praised the schools for providing practical, no-frills educational opportunities. Because playing major college sports is attractive to many young men, and often is accompanied by perquisites like being a center of attention, possible future job offers from alumni, and, for a few of them, the chance of cashing in on a professional contract, there is a sufficiently elastic supply of players at a relatively low wage to fill all of the roster slots available on major college football and men’s basketball teams.