Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sociology of Human Rights

This sample paper on (Sociology of Human Rights)was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us via our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sociology of Human Rights
Q1: In what way(s) do Human Rights NGOs contribute to institutional structural violence?

            Human Rights NGOs activities contribute to institutional structural violence in the sense that they are used by First world countries to intervene in the affairs of Third World countries. Intervention in itself is not bad, what contributes to the violence is the fact that whenever these interventions occur, the NGOs and their puppet masters (First World) are always biased. Human Rights should be based on the concept of natural law; however, due to the fact that human right violations are rampant worldwide, these bodies have the duty to step in where such injustices occur.

            The problem that is seen is with these bodies is that they tend to impose human rights parameters derived from the western countries. These Human rights imposed by these NGOs are usually individualistic in the sense that they tend to serve the NGOs and the Western countries interests. The dangers of these bodies such as the United Nations, is that they do hold the `monopoly of violence` (Bryan. Outline of a Theory of Human Rights, 202). With this, comes the ability to unilaterally decide for a country or area occupied. When this happens, sectors such as economy and politics are affected thus promoting structural violence.

Q2 Bryan Turner argues that the concept of “human” in human rights has been largely dominated by framings that we have inherited from the Western tradition of political liberalism.  He argues that such understandings render humans as being too socially “thin,” and overly individualistic. In short, they underappreciate the extent to which humans are fundamentally social.  List the main tenets of his conception of what it means to be “human” – and explain the significance of this alternative conception for the development of human rights.

            The concept of human Rights as Bryan turner argues, has rendered humans  socially `thin`, this is because human or humanity is not a concept that can be spread cross-culturally from one geographical area to another. This is further complicated by the fact that the divide between human and non-human is not a fixed quantity or parameter but rather variable. Different cultures would produce different humans bearing different tenets of human Rights. Humans are described as being socially `thin’ because the modern human rights tenets are based on United Nations Universal declarations on Human Rights. The fact that United Nation seems to be the universal body that sets the `acceptable` human rights to be used worldwide means that socially human beings can only behave or socialize with each other as spelt out in this declaration. The very fact that humanrights are attached to UnitedNation means that in essence it is biased and heavily leans on the western nation’s culture.

            Like Turner, Ladicola and Shupe in ‘Violence, Inequality and HumanFreedom’assert that being human is a socially produced form rather than being shaped naturally. That this concept is fundamental to the development of human rights in the ways discussed below. In capitalist society, human rights have been thought to have stemmed out of individualistic and egoistic society.  Such tendencies of individualism and egoism have largely contributed to violence. An example of such acts of violence is the race riots in America where minorities are often agitating for equal rights (Peter, Anson, 33). This has largely contributed to Bodies like United Nations trying to come up with ways to apply rights on a level playing field across the globe. By trying to apply a common humanity across the globe means that rights become gradually accepted in most parts of the world and thus enhancing the fight on social injustices globally. Human Rights, becomes a very important supplement of the concept of citizenship in that while citizenship is defined boundaries, human rights on the other hand run across boundaries and applies to people from all races by acknowledging that as different as we may be in color or practices, we are all equal and deserve to be  treated equally.

Q3 Hans Joas argues that the genesis of human rights discourse derives not from what Max Weber characterized as a “charismatization (or Sacralization) of reason,” but rather from a sacralization of the person. In what ways does Joas’ argument complement Bryan Turner’s?

             Max Weber, in his writing had put emphasis on sacralization of the person and not sacralization of reason. But even then, sacralization is one sided and does not affect all human beings equally unlike human dignity which applies to all human beings equally irrespective of colour or race or whether mentally unstable or otherwise. (Joas, 11).Turner pegs great importance on law as one of the fundamental fabrics that holds society together. He asserts that law is a fundamental aspect in upholding human rights and freedoms.  Joas on the other hand puts emphasis on human dignity as a factor that has contributed to promoting rights in the society.

            Human beings are always in a state of conflict if left in the natural, the weak and minorities would be in danger of extinction. This is the reason why `foundationalist ontology ` approach is helpful in checking and curbing of human rights abuse (Bryan, A reply to Waters, 566). To protect the very principles of human dignity, nations need to come up with a universal legislation of rules and laws to promote and protect human dignity.Max Weber asserts that `peace is incompatible with human life` and this realization is what has led to the move from sacralization of reason to sacralization of the person. This is in recognition that the `person` or human dignity is more important than the law or state that often in a way or the other contributes largely to violation of the very rights they are supposed to protect.

            Much as both Hans and Bryan Turner postulate different theories and approaches to human rights, what comes out with perfect clarity between these writers is the recognition of human rights as being primal compared to law, state and even citizenship as it traverses all regions and encompasses all forms of human life. More importantly is the fact that it can be applies equally to all human beings in the whole world.

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works Cited

Turner, Bryan S. “Outline of a theory of human rights.” Sociology 27.3 (1993): 489-512.

            Ladicola, Shupe. Violence, Inequality and Human Freedom.The Domain of Violence.

Iadicola, Peter, and Anson Shupe. Violence, inequality, and human freedom.

 Rowman & Littlefield, 2012

Joas, Hans. The sacredness of the person: A new genealogy of human rights.

Georgetown University Press, 2013.

Turner, Bryan S. “A neo-Hobbesian theory of human rights: a reply to Malcolm Waters.”

            Sociology 31.3 (1997): 565-571.

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sociology of Human Rights

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sociology of Human Rights)? Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sociology of Human Rights

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Sociology of Human Rights

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com