Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sample Dissertation Chapter Paper on Judicial Activism or Restraint

This sample paper on (Sample Dissertation Chapter Paper on Judicial Activism or Restraint) was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sample Dissertation Chapter Paper on Judicial Activism or Restraint

Supreme Court history. In accordance to the Due Process Clause as well as the Equal Protection Clause enforced by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution the Supreme Court held a 5–4 decision that allowed same sex couples to legally get married. Despite the Supreme Court quoting the constitution many other political and judicial critics such as Rick Perry this action as an instance of the court being playing the activist role by bending the law to favour the LGBT community. Due to the nature of the case it is the aim of this paper to draw a conclusion of weather this was a case of Judicial Activism or Restraint.

On 26thJune 2015 Justice Anthony Kennedy suggested that there is no union as valued as marriage (Vanita,46). In his explanation he saw that LGBT community respect the union and would seek to find its fulfilment for themselves hence asking to be seen equal to the rest of the community who were allowed the right to get married. According to him“The Constitution grants them that right…No longer may this liberty be denied (52)”. According to the Supreme Court justice panel the judgment passed was constitutionally right and all they did was to exercise judicial restraint. In this case, the objectives of the court allowed judicial interpretation that permitted the judges to limit the exercise of their own commandhowever in reference to the constitution.The judges did not formulate a new law or bend any existing law in the Obergefell v. Hodges case on the other hand  they duly applied the rights already guaranteed by the Constitution as stated in the Fourteenth Amendment in reference to the Equal Protection Clause as well as Due Process Clause that existed for about two decades (Wells, 46). Despite this to many others they had it wrong as they have done so in past cases.

In Korematsu v. U.S. (Vile, 311), and Minor v. Happersett(316),cases the supreme court made serious errors in judgment however, despite this anonymous fact perfectly constitutional. The Obergefell v. Hodges case to some critics seems to be a one of several cases the court has had it wrong. This to many has been viewed as Judicial activism which is defined as a judicial rulingalleged of being built on personal or sometimes political considerations and not than on existing law. From the above definition it is clear that the Supreme Court did not exercise any form of activism. Similar to the cases they were viewed as having it wrong now, by the time the cases were in session the court only interpreted what was before them. It should be noted that the Constitution is without doubt the supreme law of the land. This being mentioned the Supreme Court is set tointerpret what the Constitution suggests meaning the Supreme Court decisions are in fact the law of the land.

Despite this conclusion that the Supreme Court remains less of an activist and more of an interpreter does not mean that discussionon the Obergefell v. Hodges case concludes. It should be considered that just like the Minor v. Happersett caseamendments might be set to in support of the critics of the court decision similar to that of the 19th Amendment was passed in 1920.

 

Work Cited

Vanita, Ruth. Love’s Rite: Same-sex Marriage in India and the West. Houndmills, Balsingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Internet resource.

Vile, John R. Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789-2015. , 2015. Print

Wells, Michael L, and Thomas A. Eaton. Constitutional Remedies: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 2002. Print.

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sample Dissertation Chapter Paper on Judicial Activism or Restraint

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sample Dissertation Chapter Paper on Judicial Activism or Restraint)?Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

 

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sample Dissertation Chapter Paper on Judicial Activism or Restraint

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Sample Dissertation Chapter Paper on Judicial Activism or Restraint

Knowledge Management Class- Report on Knowledge Management in InterContinental Hotels Group

 Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act I really appreciate your help as this is a very important assignment for me. Thank you so much! 🙂
Read More

Advanced Practice Nursing and Healthcare Policy

 Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Advanced Practice Nursing and Healthcare Policy
Read More

Nursing Assignment on Catapult to Success

 Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Nursing Assignment on Catapult to Success
Read More

Nursing Discussion Essay on Identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis

 Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act References should not be more than 5 years old
Read More

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com