Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sample Essay on Political Science

This sample paper on (Sample Essay on Political Science)was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sample Essay on Political Science

Introduction

This essay will look at arguments and concepts that were found stimulating in regards to the provided context of politics and the political scientists that have provided different views on similar topics and contexts. The essay will also look at concerns, disagreements and questions with the concepts that were encountered, in addition to the linkages, connections and negations arising from the discussed issues.

The filibuster rule requires that there is a minimal requirement of 60 individuals in the Senate to vote for a nomination, bill or legislation in order for it to get the consideration that it requires to be debated in the house. The filibuster is seen as being used as a delay tactic, and in some cases, to stop the debating of a bill in Senate. This perspective is seen as being wrong by some members of the public and section of the Senate because it requires that the bill or nomination get that many votes even if it is due to the objection of just one member or just one issue raised by a member of the Senate who has a different view from the rest of the members of the house. The members of the public have criticized the Senate as lacking focus because the filibuster move has been used to come in the way of appointment for judges, executives and bills that have been proposed in the house.

 One of the most popular filibuster moves occurred recently in 2009 when the Republicans opposed the Obama healthcare bill which fuelled demands from the members of the public and media for imposition of a limit on which the members of the Senate can hold debate over an issue in Senate. Some politicians feel that the United States cannot achieve meaningful progress in future as long as the filibuster is in place. According to minority leader Ms Pelosi, the alternative that an only 50 member vote would be sufficient to defeat a filibuster should be chosen; because a 60 vote requirement is too high. The original intention of putting the filibuster in place was noble; to ensure that the executive are put in place through “checking on the decisions that they make such as nomination of qualified judges who would be impartial regardless of their political affiliations.

Cloture has been proposed as one of the most effective ways that would effectively deal with a filibuster through placing a time limit on the time within which legislature or other matters would be under discussion by the Senate.  According to Arenberg and Dove, Cloture was introduced in 1917, but has only been successfully used for five times; which has been blamed on the Senate’s habit of getting used to filibusters (17). According to Arenberg and Dove (19) the need for the filibuster is defended and attacked by different political parties depending on their agenda at that particular time. To the layman, it appears that the use of filibusters in Congress and in the House is meant to frustrate the efforts of opposing political parties; Democrats and Republicans; depending on who is proposing a bill or nomination; on the grounds that it is done for the purposes of increased duration for debating. The possibility of a filibuster, the duration it takes for a cloture and post cloture process to be administered, is one of the greatest influences on how a bill is brought before the Senate by sponsoring members. This might affect the effectiveness of the proposed bill; rendering it less efficient in the long run. Different members of the Senate have opposing views about whether the filibuster should be removed or continue to be used. One of the most important reasons as to why the filibuster continues to be supported is that it gives a voice to the minority in Senate.

            According to Binder, Madonna and Smith, a Nuclear Senate style proposal to conduct matters in the House would have resulted in a near war state. The Nuclear Senate approach would have resulted in high levels of filibustering towards the nomination of judges (730).

 Looking at the evolution of how Senate matters are conducted, one can come to the conclusion that the minority members have used caution in the past in the matters that they filibuster or obstruct. The minority in Senate tries and ensures that the issues that they raise are relevant to the matters or legislature that is being discussed.  This restraint is one of the reasons why the filibuster is seen as being necessary to ensure that the legislation that is passed is thoroughly debated on.

 Throughout history, senators have changed their preferences as to how the Senate should be run in terms of who holds power; majority and minority groups; and over which issues. Opinions and preferences have varied over time over party affiliations and interest held over the legislature that would be passed. The changes in the duties and expectations that are expected of different organizations are some of the reasons as to why there have been changes in how the Senate debates or/ and want changes to be made in passing legislature. Unified and workload approaches are some of the theories that have been proposed as being a reason for the change in the manner in which senators view and propose changes in procedures to enacting laws (Koger 710). The procedures that come with passing legislation are necessary to ensure that all the bills that are brought before Senate are relevant, and any amendments that can be made to lead to better outcomes have been considered. It is for the maintenance of this thoroughness and need to take national matters seriously, that the filibuster should be upheld and maintained.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works cited

Arenberg, Richard & Robert Dove. Defending the Filibuster: The Soul of the Senate.

Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 2012. Print.

Binder, Sarah., Anthony Madonna and Steven Smith. Going Nuclear, Senate Style. Perspective

on politics. 5 (4) 720 740. 2007. Print.

Koger, Gregory. Cloture Reform and party government in the Senate, 1918 1925. University of

Montana.

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sample Essay on Political Science

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sample Essay on Political Science)?Well you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

 

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sample Essay on Political Science

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Sample Essay on Political Science

Assignment on Apply digital solutions to work processes -a1

You will need to use harvard referencing This must be Australian. The learning resources I have provided are in the ZIP files
Read More

SOC340 Final Research Question & Methods Paper

The research question and methods paper provides you the opportunity to expand upon the knowledge you gained in Soc331 in forming a research question, performing empirical research using the library...
Read More

Violent Video Games: Should the government pass laws restricting children’s access to violent video

Search in GMC’s Issues & Controversies database and find three (3) articles that support your stance (point 3 of view) on the topic
Read More

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com