Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sample Essay on Fall 2016 - Law - Writing Assignment Two

This sample paper on (Sample Essay on Fall 2016 - Law - Writing Assignment Two) was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us via our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sample Essay on Fall 2016 - Law - Writing Assignment Two

Insider trading denotes to the trading of stock of a public company or securities of the company by people with privy to information of the company that is not yet made public. In some cases, the practice is unfair as it puts investors without access to such information at a disadvantage given that an investor privy to such information stands a better chance of making a profit than an ordinary investor. Insider trading by directors, corporate officers, and employees often aim at maximizing profits or avoiding losses. Insiders, in this case, involve any beneficial trade with a substantial amount of a company’s stock or securities. Additionally, insiders include directors, employees within the company who have the fiduciary duty to shareholders within the company. Insiders may also include persons who use non-public information to trade in shares as it falls under the violation of the contractual obligation of trust. Illegal insider trading is a situation whereby an insider who has privy information not yet public undertakes buying and selling.  On the other hand, legal insider trading is whereby a director or employee engages in buying and selling of stock or bonds, but abides by the rules and regulations of the SEC, for instance, an insider buying stock with the expectation of good performance of the company over a long period.

The classical and misappropriation theory offers a theoretical foundation upon which criminality of insider trading may be determined. According to classical theory, a violation occurs when an insider is involved in trading using material and information that is not within the public domain. In this case, corporate insiders who have the fiduciary obligation to the company’s shareholders may be guilty of insider trading. The theory also applies to temporary insiders such as lawyers, consultants, underwriters or anyone who temporarily have an access to such inside information. In this case, the temporary insiders are barred from using the inside information to engage in trading as they remain and have fiduciaries of the company.

The misappropriation theory entails stealing classified information from a company and using the information to engage in trading. The theory further expands to persons who may also use the information to trade for their own benefit of profit within the company.

The facts presented and available about the NEWTECH and OLDTECH securities transactions present different scenarios of insider trading in which the individuals involved breached the rules and regulations governing trading in companies’ stocks and securities. Jim Greedy, as a public relations officer at NEWTECH, has access to information on the merger between NEWTECH and OLDTECH, an information that is t yet made public. As an insider, Jim Greedy has the moral obligation and fiduciary duty to the company’s shareholders on the trading of bonds and securities within the company. He is therefore barred by SEC laws from taking advantage of the inside information to purchase any of the company’s shares to his advantage for profit gain. Additionally, by failing to report his trades with and to the SEC, Jim Greedy is thus involved in an illegal insider trading within the company that has bestowed trust and the moral duty to safeguard such information. His action thus, is a breach of trust, confidence, and fiduciary obligation to the non-public information. By selling his newly acquired shares immediately after the announcement, Jim Greedy confirms that he has taken advantage of the inside information for personal gain, violating the responsibility of duty bestowed upon him by the company and the shareholders. From his initial purchase of 100,000 shares, Jim Greedy makes a profit of $500,000.

Jill Avarie, is heavily involved in the negotiations for the merger of OLDTECH and NEWTECH. She, therefore, has access to the company’s information, which she decides to use for to her advantage. By calling her friend Mary Glutton to “Go for the gold; just don’t let on that I told you. Remember, you did not hear this from me”, Jill goes against the rules and regulations governing insider trading. She steals information from the company and tips her friend to make gold from the trade. According to the misappropriation theory, Jill steals privy information not yet made public to enable her friend Mary Glutton engages in trading. Jill violates the fiduciary duty to the company and to the company’s shareholders by trading on inside information with her friend. On the other hand, her friend, Mary Glutton, is consciously aware that the information given to her by Jill is a vital factor in the trades of the company and that the information given is not provided to her in good faith. By going along with Jill’s request not to disclose the source of the information, she is engaging in misappropriation of vital information of the company.

 According to the rules and regulations of the SEC, trading in such a circumstance may only be legal when the information was given or accessed is not and may not form a factor in the company’s trade, plans, or contract and that the information provided is made in good faith. Jill Avarie and Mary Glutton are thus in violation of the rules and regulations on trading according to the SEC according to the misappropriation theory. They are therefore involved in an illegal insider trading. According to the misappropriation theory, Mary Glutton owes a duty of obligation to the company and to the shareholders and therefore is liable in accordance with the premise. Mary Glutton immediately sells her shares and makes a profit of &250,000, a clear indication that she used privy information for personal gain.

Joe Lawyer has full-classified information on the merger details between OLDTECH and NEWTECH. He acknowledges the upcoming sale of shares of the merger and goes ahead to purchase 200,000 shares. He convinces himself that he has no duty to both the company and the shareholder, a conviction that urges him to go ahead with the trade. When the information is made public in June 2016, he sells his 200,000 NEWTECH shares and makes a profit of $1 million. Even though Joe Lawyer has no relationship or duty with the company or the shareholders, he is a temporary insider with access to classified and privy information not yet made public, according to the classical theory. He, therefore, owes the company and the shareholders fiduciary duty, to safeguard any information he accesses within or while undertaking his duties between the two merging companies. He is thus involved in fraudulent insider trading by taking advantage of his position to benefit himself. He owes the company and the shareholders, the moral obligation to safeguard any information obtained while working within the merger of the two companies and trades illegally for personal gain when he goes ahead with the purchase of the shares.

The four individuals are thus in violation of the rules and regulations on insider trading. By taking advantage of their positions and alignment with the two companies on the verge of merging, they go against the fiduciary duty to both the company and the shareholders to safeguard any privy information not yet out in the public domain. However, they use the opportunity and information for their own benefit in order to make profit.

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sample Essay on Fall 2016 - Law - Writing Assignment Two

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sample Essay on Fall 2016 – Law – Writing Assignment Two)? Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sample Essay on Fall 2016 - Law - Writing Assignment Two

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Sample Essay on Fall 2016 - Law - Writing Assignment Two

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com