Open Always
Email: Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada

This sample paper on (Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada) was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us via our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada

Charter is used in providing the citizens and residents of Canada with a wide range of rights that are highlighted in the country’s constitution. The power of the Canadian courts was greatly extended after the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, referred to as the Charter, was enacted in the year 1982. After the enactment, the courts were given powers to adjudicate in various areas and the branches of the government. For instance, they can give a ruling concerning the division of powers between different levels of government. Courts can as well deliver a judgment in regards to the legality and constitutionality of the laws that could be enacted by the provincial legislatures and the Parliament (Hogg 39). 

Charter can be viewed as the promises that are made by the state to its citizens (Hogg 42). In the case of the Carter v. Canada, the state has guaranteed its citizens the safety and security of their lives. As a result, it has promised to protect their lives unless the occurrence of the natural death. In the case, the plaintiff was in a position that physician-assisted death should be allowed with the consent of the patient. However, the defendant was in the view that allowing physician-assisted death will be allowing legalizing act of causing another person’s death. Supreme Court of Canada made final decision confirming that Canadians have the rights as per their constitution of choosing physician assistance in dying.In its ruling in the Carter v. Canada, it found out that there were laws that were used to deprive S7 right to life, security and liberty for the citizens like Gloria Taylor that were suffering from terminal and serious illnesses. They hence denied the section 7 rights of a person to make choices that are important to their lives and hence caused avoidable sufferings.

In their ruling judges of the Supreme Court used the charter to limit the scope of the legislation and the administrative powers. The court proposed for the amendment of the constitution and forwarded its recommendation to the Parliament to amend the clauses in the constitution which is the supreme law of Canada. Charter limitation helps the court in protecting the rights of minority as well as the protection of civil libertarian values (Vogel 421)

 The court ruling mostly has a remarkable victory for the protection of human rights and freedom. The Supreme Court hence can use the Charter to limit the administrative power even if the attorney general and the parliament are in contra opinion. The Court hence uses the Charter to limit administrative when interpreting the freedom and rights of citizens. The freedom is in regards to their lives, liberty, and security. The court judgment can, therefore, legalize and strike the Criminal Codes that prohibit citizens from enjoying their freedom as well as exercising their constitutional rights (Vogel 422).

The Supreme Court of Canada is mandated with the role to interpret and enforce the Carter. It hence has an absolute power on the matters laid down by the Charter. The court hence has ultimate authority in determining the criminal laws that are deemed to cause the violation of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The court hence uses Charter to limit the legislative work of the legislation and forward laws that need to be amended to the Parliament.

Opinion on the Legitimacy Role for the Courts Concerning Use of Charter

In my opinion, the interpretation and the enforcement of the Charter are the legitimate roles of the Supreme Court of Canada. Section 52 of the Canadian Constitution Act, of the year 1982 confirmed the Charter’s supremacy. The courts have been playing a significant role in striking down the clauses that are unconstitutional.

In the case of Carter v. Canada, it is the legitimate role of the court to strike down the unconstitutional statutes that were not in support of the individuals’ rights to life. In the case of Carter v. Canada, the Court determined the unconstitutionality and illegality in the statutes that prohibited the citizens from making life choices concerning their death. The issue was also involving painful and incurable illness that could be affecting majority citizens and had a chance of being avoided.

The court has been bestowed with the decisive power of interpreting and enforcing the Charter. Courts in most cases receive a number of Charter questions from the citizens and the government. Rights claimants have a high chance of being prosecuted under a criminal law if the court argues that the act was unconstitutional. A ruling government can raise questions of the rights through making a submission of reference questions to the Supreme Court of the country.

The Supreme Court has a decisive authority of judicial review over the Canadian federal and provincial laws’ constitutional validity. For instance, if the provincial or federal law has been found to contradict the division of power as provided by the acts in a constitution, parliament can only live with the results or conduct the amendment to the law. The legislature can as well validate a particular law temporarily through the use of override power provided by the notwithstanding clause.

As a general rule, courts have included in their scope the role of interpretation charter rights. Traditionally their functions were limited to understanding every charter and explained what it meant to citizens. Since the year 1982 after the adoption of Charter, court embraced a purposive role of altering the scope of rights. The move was supposed to ensure that the rights are applied in a way that they effectively fit their broader purpose. The function is in line with the generous interpretation of human rights and the freedom of citizens in different situations. The role is hence meant to benefit the people and ensure that they exercise their constitutional rights at the expense of the government powers.

Estimation Concerning the Decision of the Case of Carter v. Canada

In the case, the Supreme Court declared that some Criminal Code provisions had no force. The court stated that the Codes contribute significantly in prohibiting citizens from exercising their constitutional rights and freedoms. According to the court, the statutes make it an illegal act for an adult person who has a clear consent to the termination of life. The individuals are the members of the society who are suffering from severe terminal illnesses. The diseases cause severe sufferings that are intolerable to the victims in their health conditions and are unnecessary.

The decision of the court in Carter v. Canada was not carried out in a correct manner because the court created a lot of doubts that could delay implementation and the amendment of the statutes. For instance, the words that were used during the ruling created doubt on whether the court was intending to legalize euthanasia. The court was ruling on the assisted suicide, but it was not clear whether its decision was also legalizing euthanasia.

The fact that Court caused some doubts in that it did not provide for or substantiate between legalizing assisted suicide, and voluntary euthanasia indicated that the ruling was not decided correctly. In the court decision, it did not provide for legal justification for either assisted suicide or euthanasia. The decision was rather silence on the euthanasia as a result of it particular seriousness concerning the legality and ethical implications on the part of the medical practitioners.

The court decision was based on the fact that it was striking down Section 14. However, it was clear that the effects were to the extent that the section was to affect its ruling for the case at hand. Interpretation of Section 14 could hence be used to refer to the assisted suicide which could be the intention of the court. The decision was not clear since the intended scope by the court of striking Section 14 was not clear.

The court uses Charter to protect the rights and the freedom of the citizens. The decision of the case hence aimed at protecting the rights of the citizens who suffered from terminal and painful diseases. However, the decision did not clarify on the legal implications of the physicians who were not willing to participate on the assisted dying. The decision could have also considered the freedom and rights of the physicians in a situation that they were not willing to provide and participate in assisted dying. The court did not make it clear whether it was legalizing euthanasia according to its decision.












Works Cited

Carter v. Canada (Attorney General)

Hogg, Peter W.Constitutional Law of Canada. Toronto: Carswell, 2013.

Vogel, Lauren. “CMA developing assisted death guidelines.” CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 187.13 (2015): 421-422. Print.


Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada)? Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Writing Features

Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change
A Short List of our Services
Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada

Related Articles

Sample Case Study on Supreme Court Use of the Charter to Limit the Scope of Legislation and Administrative Power in Canada

Analyze the Nursing Roles in providing Comprehensive care in a Variety of Community Health Settings

Community Settings This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs). CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (POs...
Read More

Case Study Assignment on Ethical Issues in Asia-Pacific business

Case study assignment on Ethical Issues in Asia-Pacific business For this assignment, students will write a case study report in 2,000 words based on a case identified with circumstance or...
Read More

Sample Report Paper on The proposed reward system and strategy for the big city university

A good reward system should motivate workers. It should also attract and retain the same workers. On the contrary, a bad reward system does not do either of these things....
Read More

Management of PCOS through Homoeopathy-A case report

Introduction PCOS is the acronym for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. It is the most common endocrine disorder of women in their reproductive period manifested by irregular menstrual cycles and polycystic ovaries,...
Read More

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: