Open Always
Email: Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Argumentative Essay on Case against Mariposa Stores Limited

This sample paper on (Argumentative Essay on Case against Mariposa Stores Limited) was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us via our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Argumentative Essay on Case against Mariposa Stores Limited

What are the respective rights and obligations of employees, the union, and the employer in a situation such as this?

            The Labor Relations Actguarantee employees certain workplace rights. It defines the employee as someone who works according to the employer’s schedule, with employer’s tools and in a workplace determined by the employer for a salary. Lewin & Gollan (2011) reveal that employees have two major obligations towards their employer or the organization that employs them. To begin with, employees must perform their work as stipulated in their job description. However, employees may refuse to do anything that violates their professional ethics, or it threatens their safety, or it is illegal in their country. Secondly, employees must remain loyal to their employer. It is the obligation of the employees to keep off from situations that conflict with the interests of the employer. Moreover, the must avoid using the confidential information for personal gain.

            Employers, on the other hand, have several legal obligations towards their employees. Lewin & Gollan (2011) notes that they should only provide their employees with work that matches their job description or employment contract. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the employers to pay their employees regularly and to compensate them for any additional hours worked beyond a standard workweek commonly referred as overtime. Employers must also ensure that they do not put the safety and health of their employees at risk through the unfavorable working environment. When terminating an employee’s contract, it is the obligation of the employers to issue a reasonable notice, or they compensate the employee for the notice period. Employees working in a similar establishment must be accorded the same employment terms and conditions. Furthermore, employers must respect their employees while cultivating a workplace that protects their dignity. Employers must also provide a workplace environment that is free from sexual harassment and discrimination of any kind.

            Although trade unions are primarily for fighting for the rights of their members, they also acknowledgethe importance of a good partnership with employers. Lewin & Gollan (2011) observe that they recognize the fact that a successful organization is not only good for the employer but also for the workers and the union. Trade unions have the obligation of promoting collective bargaining power for its members. It represents its members in negotiating with the employer for a better pay and good working conditions. Trade unions also have the obligation of promoting the welfare of their members such as protection froma subjective action, protection froman unreasonable working schedule, promoting job security, and enhancing work-life balance. Trade unions also prevent employers’ unfair labor practices such as victimizing employees who file complaints with the Labor Relations Board. Additionally, trade unions play a central role is creation and development of labor regulations. They lobby for implementation of labor laws as well as disseminating necessary information to their members.

What are the critical issues to be decided by the board?

            One of the issues to be decided by the Alberta Labor Relations Board according to Alberta Labor Relations Board, UFCW Local 401 et al. v. Mariposa Stores Limited et al., (1986) is the dismissal without good cause. All the staff from store 58 were dismissed without a sufficient ground. Included in the dismissal were the store manager, Elaine Howatt, who had a track record of performing exceptionally well before her dismissal. Additionally, three other staff who were newly recruited and Alison Ranson, who had been on holiday was dismissed. Another critical issue to be decided by the board is the certification of the union. Whether the union in question has met the necessary conditions to become the bargaining agent for employees of store 58. The third critical issue to be decided by the board is whether Mariposa Stores Limited engaged in unfair labor practices and if so, the right action to take to remedy the situation.

Which party bears the burden of proof, and why?

            According to the Alberta Labor Relations Board, UFCW Local 401 et al. v. Mariposa Stores Limited et al., (1986) the company, Mariposa Stores Limited bears the burden of proof in this case due to several reasons. Contrary to the company’s reason for firing, Elaine Hawatt’s testimony indicates that Company’s newsletters praised store 58 on various occasions for exemplary performance. Hawatt also indicated to the Alberta board that she had reduced staff costs to sales ratio from 10% in March to 7% in July. As a result, she had received a bonus which managers are entitled to good performance.   Moreover, during training and remerchandising conducted at store 58 by the senior representative of the company, Marlene Williams, and other top executives including Linda Coleman and Eva Shipsides on August 7, positive comments were made about the performance of some staff. For instance, Williams described Penner as a very dynamic staff. She also stated that Shynkaruk could be ready to take up managerial role during winter that year. On her part, Coleman noted that Moira Lock was doing exemplary well. Shipsides also praised Brenda Jagt indicating that she could soon become a management trainee. Moreover, both Coleman and Shipsides recognized Karen Bossert because her section was very clean and because she had special cashiering skills. In a nutshell, virtually all the staff in store 58 were recommended for good performance during remerchandising and training that happened a few days before firing. So, the company bears the biggest burden of proof as it alleged that the reason behind termination was poor performance and unacceptable store operations in Store 58.

What conditions would a union have to satisfy in order to become a certified bargaining agent for these employees?

            According to Lewin & Gollan (2011), the Union needs to show that at least 45% of the employees in store 58 are in support of union representation. If so, the union should apply for certification to the Alberta Labor Relations Board. The union will then lobby employees to sign membership cards because the board orders a secret ballot voting ten days after application to determinewhether 45% or more employees want to join the union. The Board will then convene a hearing within seven days to determine the effectiveness of certification. Before certification, the Board must ensure that the trade union is defined under the LRC. It also ensures that the employees constitute a proper collective bargaining unit. The Board also checks if the trade union has the required membership support through counting the cast votes. If the applicant trade union meets these requirements, then the Board will exclusively certify it as the official bargaining agent for those employees.

What remedial power does the board have at its disposal in this situation?

            The Labor Relations Act gives the Alberta LRB the power to provide remedies to rectify the violation of basic labor practices. In this case, the board has the power to reinstate all the employees of Store 58 dismissed contrary to the Labor Relations Act. It may also order Mariposa Stores Limited to compensate the dismissed employees contrary to the Act. The amount to be compensated should not exceed the amount which the employer would have paid the employees, including the amount of interest if any, for funds borrowed by the employees to support their families during the entire period of dismissal. Moreover, the board also has the power to certify or decline to certify the trade union in question as the official bargaining agent for Mariposa Limited employees (Alberta Labor Relations Board, 2014).

Briefly, in your opinion, did the employer engage in an unfair labor practice? Why?

            From my point of view, the employer engaged in unfair labor practices in many ways. Apart from firing the employees of store 58 without a sufficient and good cause, the employer also contravened the Labor Relations Act through firing employees without prior notice or compensating them for the notice period. Additionally, the employer failed to adhere to proper working conditions for the employees. Finally, the employer denied the employees their basic right of joining a trade union.















Alberta Labor Relations Board, UFCW Local 401 et al. v. Mariposa Stores Limited et al., [1986] Alta. L.R.B.R. 661.

Alberta Labor Relations Board. (2014). A guide to Alberta’s labor relations laws. Calgary, Alta: Alberta Labor Relations Board.

Lewin, D., Kaufman, B. E., & Gollan, P. J. (2011). Advances in industrial and labor relations: Vol. 18. Bingley: Emerald Group.

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Argumentative Essay on Case against Mariposa Stores Limited

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Argumentative Essay on Case against Mariposa Stores Limited)? Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Argumentative Essay on Case against Mariposa Stores Limited

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Argumentative Essay on Case against Mariposa Stores Limited

Analyze the Nursing Roles in providing Comprehensive care in a Variety of Community Health Settings

Community Settings This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs). CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (POs...
Read More

Case Study Assignment on Ethical Issues in Asia-Pacific business

Case study assignment on Ethical Issues in Asia-Pacific business For this assignment, students will write a case study report in 2,000 words based on a case identified with circumstance or...
Read More

Sample Report Paper on The proposed reward system and strategy for the big city university

A good reward system should motivate workers. It should also attract and retain the same workers. On the contrary, a bad reward system does not do either of these things....
Read More

Management of PCOS through Homoeopathy-A case report

Introduction PCOS is the acronym for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. It is the most common endocrine disorder of women in their reproductive period manifested by irregular menstrual cycles and polycystic ovaries,...
Read More

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: