Health Care Research Paper on Integrative Project Week 3

Case Assignment 3 – Topic Indoor Air Pollution (IAP)

Module 3 – Case

OUTLINING YOUR REVIEW/PLAN/PAPER/PROPOSAL

Case Assignment

Recall that in MHS504, you were required to draft an outline as a first step toward structuring your Session Long Project paper for that course. For this Case Assignment, you are required to do the same, using components of your chosen project type (i.e., literature review, program plan, program evaluation, policy analysis paper, or research proposal) as your outline’s main headings. Click on the links in the table below to refresh your memory regarding components of each of these.

Literature review Program plan Program evaluation Policy analysis paper Research proposal
https://guides.library.ucsc.edu/write-a-literature-review

 

https://www.thecommunityguide.org/about/about-community-guide https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/index.htm https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/White-Papers-Guidelines.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3282423/

Please upload your 2- to 4-page outline to the Case 3 Dropbox by the end of this module.

Length: 2-4 pages, double-spaced (excluding cover-page).

Format: APA format is required for this assignment.

 

 

SLP Assignment 3 (integrative project continuation)

Continue to assemble your annotated bibliography, accumulating and annotating an additional 5 scholarly sources (at least 5 of which must be peer-reviewed this includes SLP 1 and 2). By now, your paper should consist of at least 15 scholarly sources total (I currently have 12 from SLP 1 and 2). Highlight new sources that you added for this module. Upload your updated bibliography to the SLP 3 Dropbox by the end of this module.

Length: Add 3-5 more and highlight them, double-spaced

Format: APA format is required for this assignment.

 

Below is last week assignment (left here only as a reference)

Continue to assemble your annotated bibliography, adding and annotating a minimum of 5–8 additional sources (at least 5 of which must be peer-reviewed) to those previously incorporated in Module 1. These may include but should not be limited to resources identified for your Module 1 and 2 Case assignments. Make sure to include at least one source that addresses how diverse perspectives or cultural differences affect the problem you are seeking to further understand. Highlight new sources that you added for this module.

Upload this revised draft of your annotated bibliography to the SLP 2 Dropbox by the conclusion of this module.

Length: 4-pages, double-spaced (excluding cover-page).

Format: APA format is required for this assignment.

 

Guide

Use of scholarly sources: You are expected to utilize scholarly sources in preparing your paper and incorporate relevant background readings. Online sources must be limited to credible professional and scholarly publications such as peer-reviewed journal articles, e-books, or specific webpages on websites from a university, government, or nonprofit organization.

Use of your own words: Your paper should be written in your own words to enable faculty to assess your level of understanding. Use of direct quotes should be avoided. Only use direct quotes when preserving the exact words of an author is necessary. In the rare instance that directly quoted material is used, it must be properly cited (with quotation marks and page numbers in the in-text citation); quotes should not exceed 5% of the total paper content.

In-text citations and reference list: Cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list. In-text citations and reference list should conform to APA guidelines.

Error-free submissions: Proofread your paper to ensure it is free of errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling, and that each part of the assignment has been addressed clearly and completely.

Similarity Index (SI) score: Papers with TurnItIn SI score of 15% or higher (excluding direct quotes and references) will be reviewed by the instructor to distinguish between correctly documented research and possible academic dishonesty. Please use the report and your SI score as a guide to improve the originality of your work.

File format: Your work should be prepared using Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, or Excel depending upon the assignment instructions. For assignments requiring video or voice recordings, use media formats that are supported by MyTLC Courses as noted in our Trident Support page.

Privacy Policy | Contact

 

Grading Rubric

Criteria

Level 4 – Excellent

Level 3 – Proficient

Level 2 – Developing

Level 1 – Emerging

Assignment-Driven Criteria

10 points

Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

9 points

Demonstrates considerable proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

8 points

Demonstrates partial proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

7 points

Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

/ 10

Critical Thinking

6 points

Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem. Viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated. Conclusions are logically presented with appropriate rationale.

5 points

Demonstrates considerable proficiency conceptualizing the problem. Viewpoints and assumptions of experts are proficiently analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated. Conclusions are presented with necessary rationale.

4 points

Demonstrates partial proficiency conceptualizing the problem. Viewpoints and assumptions of experts are somewhat analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated. Conclusions are somewhat consistent with the analysis and findings.

3 points

Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency in conceptualizing the problem. Viewpoints and assumptions of experts are either absent or poorly analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated. Conclusions are either absent or poorly conceived and supported.

/ 6

Scholarly Writing

3 points

Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

2 points

Demonstrates considerable proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

1 point

Demonstrate partial proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

0 points

Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

/ 3

Quality of References and Assignment Organization

5 points

Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.

4 points

Demonstrates considerable proficiency using somewhat appropriate sources and demonstrates considerable proficiency in using appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.

3 points

Demonstrates partial proficiency using occasionally appropriate sources and partially uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.

2 points

Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency using sources and appropriate and does not use appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.

/ 5

Citing Sources

3 points

Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).

2 points

Demonstrates considerable proficiency using of in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).

1 point

Demonstrates partial proficiency using in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).

0 points

Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency using text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).

/ 3

Timeliness

3 points

Assignment submitted on time or collaborated with professor for an approved extension on due date.

2 points

Assignment submitted 1-2 days after module due date.

1 point

Assignment submitted 3-4 days after module due date.

0 points

Assignment submitted 5 or more days after module due date.

/ 3

Total

— / 30