Common Framework for Assessing Ethics Learning Objectives in Bus 280 Legal Environment of Business

ETHICS EVALUATION SHEET BUS 280
COMMON FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING ETHICS LEARNING OBJECTIVES
IN BUS 280 LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS
(This framework will be used when grading the paper.)
1. ALTERNATIVES: How well did the student identify alternative courses of action? ___excellent
Identification of at least two alternatives, and
Creativity in formulating one or more alternatives ___adequate: Identification of at least two alternatives ___unsatisfactory: Failure to identify at least two alternatives
2. STAKEHOLDERS: How well did the student identify stakeholders? ___excellent: Application of the concept of stakeholder in an expansive manner ___adequate: Identification of the most obvious people likely to be affected by an
alternative, but omission of others ___unsatisfactory: Omission of obvious stakeholders
3. EVALUATION OF ETHICS: How well did the student evaluate the ethics of each alternative
according to moral rights, justice, and/or utilitarianism? ___ excellent
Demonstration of a thorough understanding of each ethical principle which is applied, and performance of an in-depth analysis, and
Each alternative is evaluated by the same set of ethical principles, and
At least two ethical principles are applied, and
Responsibilities within the organization and/or society are emphasized (when relevant) ___ adequate
Application of each ethical principle in a plausible way, and
Each alternative is evaluated, but not necessarily by the same ethical principles, and
At least two ethical principles are applied, and
Responsibilities within the organization and/or society are mentioned (when relevant) ___ unsatisfactory
Application of ethical principles in faulty way, and/or
Failure to apply two or more ethical principles to each alternative, and/or
Failure to mention any responsibilities within the organization and/or society (when
relevant)
4. ACTION SELECTED: How well did the student select an appropriate course of action as a result of
the ethical analysis? ___excellent: The alternative selected is well supported by persuasive reasoning based
on the evaluation of its ethics ___adequate: The alternative selected is supported by the evaluation of its ethics ___unsatisfactory: The alternative selected is not supported by the evaluation