BCO 213 Human Resources Management Summer I 2020

BCO 213 Human Resources Management Summer I    2020

 Task –  Final Essay Assessment: Please answer two questions from either 1), 2) or 3) and then answer questions 4 and 5.

Each question is worth 25 points, 100 possible points total.

  • Evaluate three internal and three external recruitment channels.
  • Analyze one individual, team, plant-wide, or corporate-wide incentive system, which is available to organizations. Please refer

to its benefits and drawbacks.

  • What differentiates training from development and what are the challenges facing both?

      Please read the attached Siemens case study, entitled “Training & Development as a Strategy for Growth” and then answer the following questions:

        4) Identify four benefits to Siemens of its in-depth training and development of employees.

Please upload your answers in essay style as one document to the Turnitin link, provided on Moodle, before the required deadline on July 19th at 23.59hrs in PDF format.

Formalities:

  • Wordcount: 2,000 words
  • Cover, Table of Contents, References, and Appendix are excluded from the total word count.
  • Font: Arial 12 pts.
  • Text alignment: Justified.
  • The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

Submission: Week 8 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). July 19th at 23.59hrs.

Weight: This task has a weighting of 60% of the total grade for this subject.

Learning Outcomes

To express critical thinking and understanding across essential components of Human Resources, including the hiring process,

training and career development and corporate remuneration systems.

Rubrics

  Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69
Knowledge & Understanding (20%) Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner. Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary. Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary. Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.
Application (30%) Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident. Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.
Critical Thinking (30%) Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors. Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references. Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant. Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.
Communication (20%) Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident. Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident.