Key aspects of grading:
1. Presents a thorough and concise literature review of 3-4 best practice interventions for this topic area. Include a critique of those interventions. (See attached for interventions.)
2. Presents a thorough analysis of the impact of oppression and marginalization on this population.
3. Presents why intervention best fits with the writer’s professional practice style. In this case, it is a strengths-based model.
4. A clear description is included in the detail of how effectiveness is measured, and the data source is noted. In addition, a clear presentation of what success would look like.
Key aspects of grading:
1. Presents a thorough and concise literature review of 3-4 best practice interventions for this topic area. Include a critique of those interventions. (See attached for interventions.)
2. Presents a thorough analysis of the impact of oppression and marginalization on this population.
3. Presents why intervention best fits with the writer’s professional practice style. In this case, it is a strengths-based model.
4. A clear description is included in the detail of how effectiveness is measured, and the data source is noted. In addition, a clear presentation of what success would look like.
Key aspects of grading:
1. Presents a thorough and concise literature review of 3-4 best practice interventions for this topic area. Include a critique of those interventions. (See attached for interventions.)
2. Presents a thorough analysis of the impact of oppression and marginalization on this population.
3. Presents why intervention best fits with the writer’s professional practice style. In this case, it is a strengths-based model.
4. A clear description is included in the detail of how effectiveness is measured, and the data source is noted. In addition, a clear presentation of what success would look like.
Key aspects of grading:
1. Presents a thorough and concise literature review of 3-4 best practice interventions for this topic area. Include a critique of those interventions. (See attached for interventions.)
2. Presents a thorough analysis of the impact of oppression and marginalization on this population.
3. Presents why intervention best fits with the writer’s professional practice style. In this case, it is a strengths-based model.
4. A clear description is included in the detail of how effectiveness is measured, and the data source is noted. In addition, a clear presentation of what success would look like.
Key aspects of grading:
1. Presents a thorough and concise literature review of 3-4 best practice interventions for this topic area. Include a critique of those interventions. (See attached for interventions.)
2. Presents a thorough analysis of the impact of oppression and marginalization on this population.
3. Presents why intervention best fits with the writer’s professional practice style. In this case, it is a strengths-based model.
4. A clear description is included in the detail of how effectiveness is measured, and the data source is noted. In addition, a clear presentation of what success would look like.
Key aspects of grading:
1. Presents a thorough and concise literature review of 3-4 best practice interventions for this topic area. Include a critique of those interventions. (See attached for interventions.)
2. Presents a thorough analysis of the impact of oppression and marginalization on this population.
3. Presents why intervention best fits with the writer’s professional practice style. In this case, it is a strengths-based model.
4. A clear description is included in the detail of how effectiveness is measured, and the data source is noted. In addition, a clear presentation of what success would look like.