Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sample Essay on Frye and Daubert Tests

This sample paper on (Sample Essay on Frye and Daubert Tests)was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sample Essay on Frye and Daubert Tests

Introduction

For a long time, a heated debate has existed for the use of expert testimony in legal proceedings. This has been caused by the misuse of scientific evidence in an uncountable number of times resulting in innocent people being sent to jail. For instance, Gershman notes that in the case of Miller vs. Pate, the defendant was wrongly imprisoned despite the judge admitting that the scientific evidence was insufficient to warrant a fair court ruling. The Frye test gave guidelines of accepting expert evidence in law courts, but was jolted in 1993, thanks to Supreme Court ruling rendering the system insufficient. The Daubert vs. Merryl Dow case made Frye irrelevant and no longer dependable in accepting scientific evidence. This paper explains the differences between Frye and Daubert Test as well as the accepted test in Florida.

Frye Test

The Frye test was coined in 1923 in the case of Frye vs. US where James Frye was being tried for murder. The defendant presented expert evidence to the court showing his blood pressure to prove that he was saying the truth by not admitting culpability. The truth test was used to determine whether a person was telling the truth or not. In the end, the judges adopted the method and used it in subsequent cases. The test is also called the Frye Standard and entails gauging the expert evidence on the testimony of complainants and defendants. Until now, many states in the US still accept expert evidence based on Frye Standard despite the opposition that the system has received over time (Cheng & Yoon, 2005).

Daubert Test

The Daubert Test gives the guidelines regarding the acceptance of the expert testimony in legal proceedings in the United States. In court, a pursuant is allowed to raise Daubert Motion, which excludes the use of unqualified evidence by the judge(s). The Daubert trilogy refers to three cases that applied the Daubert standard: General Electric Co. v. Joiner,  Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, and  Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. Under Daubert Standard, the judge is the gatekeeper and the use of scientific evidence depends on his guidance. Second, the judge must ensure that the expert testimony is relevant to the case. Third, expert testimony will be accepted upon the proof a sound scientific methodology used to arrive at it. Lastly, relevant factors of Daubert rule include empirical testing and potential error rate (Cheng & Yoon, 2005).

Difference between Frye and Daubert Tests

In comparing the Frye and Daubert Standards, it is important to consider the DNA admissibility of both tests. Daubert Test is much more considerate to errors than Frye because it determines the rates of mistakes while gathering and compiling evidence. Additionally, in Frye tests, the calculation of genetic match is based on the admissibility of evidence whereas in Daubert is based on the weight of the evidence. The two tests also have different approaches concerning judges and their opinions on the case. In Frye, the judges have the power to give the ultimate decision concerning the truth tests. In Daubert, the judges are considered as gatekeepers are authorized to exclude any evidence that does not meet the standards of admissibility. In Frye, the expert testimony is accepted as long as it is approved by the scientific community, while in Daubert test, the evidence is accepted as long as a reliable methodology is presented. As a result, the Daubert test seems a more realistic approach to scientific evidence and it has since replaced the Frye test in many states in the US (Jensen, 2012).

Florida Courts

In July 2013, Florida amended its law to give room for the adoption of Daubert Standards in its courts. Initially, Florida followed the Frye standards but replaced with Daubert Test since it was only applicable in case an expert was required to give testimony, but remaining insufficient in a majority of cases. The overreliance on Frye Standard meant that some cases lacked grounds for assessing the admissibility of expert testimony. After the amendment, the courts acted as gatekeepers and required to give ruling on the admissibility of the expert testimony/evidence based on the Daubert standard. Some of the cases that new standard has been used are the Perez vs. Bell South Telecommunications Inc., in which the court ruled that the expert testimony was inadmissible, and the Giamo vs. Florida Autosport, where the court accepted the expert testimony presented (Stuuner et al. , 2010).

Conclusion

Despite the fact that Daubert Standard seems a better approach in admitting expert testimony, several states in the United States have stuck to the old fryer standard. One reason for this trend is long procedures required to amend the law as well as the complexity of Daubert test. However, recently, most law activists in states that use the fryer standard have lobbied for adoption of the Daubert test. The Law activists claim that some defendants have been trained to pass the truth tests even if they are innocent since it only requires one to relax and switch his mind to other irrelevant issues.

 

 

 

References

 

Cheng, E. K., & Yoon, A. H. (2005). Does Frye or Daubert matter? A study of scientific

 admissibility standards. Virginia Law Review, 471-513.

Jensen, P. J. (2012). Frye versus Daubert: Practically the same. Minn. L. Rev., 87, 1579.

Sturner, W. Q., Herrmann, M. A., Boden, C., Scarritt, T. P., Sherman, R. E., Harmon, T. S., &

Woods, K. B. (2010). The Frye hearing in Florida: an attempt to exclude scientific evidence. Journal of forensic sciences, 45(4), 908-910.

 

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sample Essay on Frye and Daubert Tests

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sample Essay on Frye and Daubert Tests)?Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

 

 

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sample Essay on Frye and Daubert Tests

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Sample Essay on Frye and Daubert Tests

Analyze the Nursing Roles in providing Comprehensive care in a Variety of Community Health Settings

Community Settings This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs). CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (POs...
Read More

Case Study Assignment on Ethical Issues in Asia-Pacific business

Case study assignment on Ethical Issues in Asia-Pacific business For this assignment, students will write a case study report in 2,000 words based on a case identified with circumstance or...
Read More

Sample Report Paper on The proposed reward system and strategy for the big city university

A good reward system should motivate workers. It should also attract and retain the same workers. On the contrary, a bad reward system does not do either of these things....
Read More

Management of PCOS through Homoeopathy-A case report

Introduction PCOS is the acronym for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. It is the most common endocrine disorder of women in their reproductive period manifested by irregular menstrual cycles and polycystic ovaries,...
Read More

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com