Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sample Term Paper on Antitrust Policies

This sample paper on (Sample Term Paper on Antitrust Policies) was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sample Term Paper on Antitrust Policies

Introduction

On April 11 2012, an article by Jim Puzzanghera on the Los Angeles Times reported a possible legal suit against Apple Inc. and five other book publishing firms (Jim, 2012). The companies were being investigated for allegedly conspiring to fix the prices of e-books in their databases. For the Antitrust officials, this act violated some of the provisions of the US Antitrust policies and warranted investigations and a possible legal suit (Jim, 2012). In essence, the US has explicitly stated antitrust legislations that vehemently prohibit any business transaction that is likely to undermine competition in the market. The Sherman Antitrust Act (especially section 1) is one such Act that is precise on the transactions that may deprive US consumers of the benefits associated with competition.

Discussions

By colluding with the publishing firms to fix prices of e-books, Apple Inc. company, after being investigated by the Antitrust officials, was found to have violated the provisions of section 1 of the Sherman Act (Waller, 2013). Actions by the accused companies involved monopolizing the interstate e-book business and shielding potential competition. This practice is a pure violation of the US Antitrust laws that prohibit unhealthy market competitions and creation of monopoly (Waller, 2013).

Market and price fixing arrangements between Apple Inc. and the five publishers clearly violate the Sherman Act, and the antitrust officials were tasked with investigating such infringements. The Antitrust officials emphasized that by merging Apple Inc. and the five publishing companies, market competition was reduced and a monopoly (imperfect competition) was likely to ensue (Waller, 2013). Essentially, a pure monopoly is characterized by the presence of and existence of a single seller and many buyers. In a monopoly, there are restraints on the entry and exit of firms into the market (Waller, 2013). Similarly, the firms in a monopoly have the capability of setting marking prices given that the consumers will be obliged to consume irrespective of the fixed prices.

This can be attributed to the fact that in a monopoly, there are no close substitutes, and the choices to consumers will be limited to the products from the Apple Inc. and the five publishing companies (Bradford, & Büthe, 2012). Notably, monopolies (such as the Apple Inc. and publishing companies) are price-makers while customers in this form of market system are price-takers. As such, companies operating in a monopoly are free to choose the production unit and the prices that will enhance the maximization of revenue (Bradford, & Büthe, 2012).        

In a situation where there is a single firm supplying the product in the market, and the firm is also dictating the prices of that particular commodity, monopoly is claimed. A firm selling skin care oil for ladies and another producing hair coloring products describes a situation of highly differentiated products. The two firms in their respective market niches will do everything to remain relevant in the business by, for example, keeping any interested firm from accessing the supply market of ladies’ oil. In essence, monopoly is bad for any viable market as it deprives the consumers the benefits associated with competition. For example, in a monopoly, a firm may decide to fix the prices of commodities and given that there are no close substitute goods, the consumers are obliged to purchase at the prevailing fixed price that may be exorbitant for some customers.

In an oligopoly, a real example may be in the business of automobiles, produced and sold by a few individuals or firms. However, buyers in this type of market structure are many, resulting in high competition between the operating firms, which all wish to increase their ability to make more profits from increased sales. Oligopoly is beneficial for consumers given that all firms are competing for market control and will do everything possible – including a possible reduction in market prices – to attract a customer base. For example, when a firm in an oligopoly decides to reduce the market prices of products, the other firms are also more likely to reduce their prices in order to remain competitive for the benefit of clients. Correspondingly, if the same firm decides to increase their market prices, the other firms are less likely to increase their prices, further benefiting the consumers.    

Conclusion

The arrangement between Apple Inc. and the five publishing companies was investigated to determine whether it violated any of US Antitrust Laws, for instance, the provisions of the Sherman Acts. Essentially, the arrangement to fix the prices of e-books deprived the consumers of benefits such as low market prices and the availability of substitute goods mostly associated with market competition, and punishable as a criminal felony in the US. The Antitrust officials further investigated the firms to determine the presence of an unlawful monopoly created by the plan to fix prices. Such anticompetitive conducts practiced by Apple Inc. and five publishing companies in the market are direct violations of the US Antitrust legislations, especially Section 1 of the Sherman Acts.

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Bradford, A., & Büthe, T. (2012, September). The Law and Politics of Antitrust in Open Economies. In Annual Conference of the European Association of Law and Economics (EALE), Stockholm.

Jim, P. (2012). Antitrust Officials reportedly sue Apple, Publishers over e-books. Los Angeles Times. 

Waller, S. W. (2013). Private Enforcement of Antitrust Laws in the United States: A Handbook, edited by Albert A. Foer & Randy M. Stutz. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012). World Competition, 36(2), 347-348.

         

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sample Term Paper on Antitrust Policies

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sample Term Paper on Antitrust Policies)?Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sample Term Paper on Antitrust Policies

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Sample Term Paper on Antitrust Policies

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com