Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Sample Paper Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. __ (2011)

This sample paper on (Sample Paper Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. __ (2011)) was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us via our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Sample Paper Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. __ (2011)
Facts

This case involved a controlled undercover operation by the Kentucky, Lexington police and Hollis King who is the defendant in this case. The operation involved selling of cocaine by the officers with the intention of luring the real culprits into the trap. The police set up the operation outside an apartment where the suspected dealer lived. The suspect fell for the trap and was seen heading to the apartments where the controlled sale was taking place. The operation was unrelated to king but he happened to move into the apartment. The police officers moved in but unfortunately lost sight of King. While in the building, the officers detected the smell of the illegal drugs in one of the rooms. They moved into the room and procedurally identified themselves. However, while in the room, there was unsettling movement and this led the police to believe that there was a plan to destroy the evidence. These movements forced the police to enter the room without any valid court warranty. In the room the officers found king and two other suspects consuming the drugs. During a search of the building, the police recovered marijuana drugs and cocaine. The suspect of the initial pursuit was however not in the building at the time. Charges were preferred against king for possession and trafficking of such controlled substances. King contested the search as having been conducted without a valid warranty. On his motion to suppress guilty plea by entering a conditional guilty plea, the court was not moved and therefore denied. King was dissatisfied by the decision of the lower court and therefore made an appeal at the Kentucky Supreme Court. The appeal

Issues

 The issues in the case were whether the warranty was necessary for a valid for any search by the police on king’s room or the police were within the law to conduct a search based on existing exigencies. It was also important to determine if king was a suspect or the target of the police in the initial operation.

Holding

On appeal to the Kentucky Supreme Court, the judges were not satisfied with the holding of the lover court and decided to reverse the decision. In the decision, it was held that the police should have sought a proper search warrant to enter the premises of King. Evidence before the court did not show a nexus between king and the original suspect. The court was also of the view that the original suspect was not aware of his pursuit by police and therefore king was acquitted of the charges preferred and the conviction of the lower court quashed

Rationale

The Supreme Court decision was based on the fact that the search was not reasonable and therefore violated the rights of King. The searches that are executed around individual homes need a proper warrant from the court and should not be arbitrary unless there are compelling exigencies which were absent in this case. An exigency should be real and not a creation of the police as was the case here. The officers did not enter the apartment in the right manner and have not demonstrated existence of any exigency to do so. Exigent circumstances should not be created by police to satisfy their narrative so as not to follow the law in acquiring orders for search

 

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Sample Paper Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. __ (2011)

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Sample Paper Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. __ (2011))? Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Privacy| Confidentiality

Sample Paper Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. __ (2011)

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Sample Paper Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. __ (2011)

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com