Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588
Open Always
Email: support@globalcompose.com Call Now! +1-315 515-4588

Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)

This sample paper on (Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)) was uploaded by one our contributors and does not necessarily reflect how our professionals write our papers. If you would like this paper removed from our website, please contact us via our Contact Us Page.

A Database of over Million Scholarly Resources. Start your Search Now

Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)

TITLE AND CITATION

The case was between Plaintiff-Appellant (John C. Ryan) and Defendant-Appellee (United States Department of Justice).

TYPE OF ACTION

Agent Ryan was relieved of his duties after 21 years of service with the FBI due to disobedience. He went to court accusing FBI of discrimination based on his religious beliefs.

FACTS OF THE CASE

In October 1986,vandalism took place at military recruiting facilities. Messages at the spot linked the destruction with pacifist groups, later identified as “Veterans Fast for Life” and “Plowshares”. The FBI issued a memoinstructing its agents to contact logical law enforcement departments to determine any similar incidents. John C. Ryan, who was in charge of domestic security and terrorism investigations at the FBI’s office in Peoria, Illinois, also received a copy of the memo. Ryan decided not to comply and be involved in this case because of his personal and religious beliefs. Ryan also decided to refuse agent James Swinford’srequest to swap assignments with Ryan. Thomas Jones, the agent in charge of the Peoria office,asked Ryan to carry out the order he receivedbut Ryan refused again. Jones started Ryan’s insubordination in 1987, and Ryan was fired after 21 years of service.

ISSUE

Due to his religious beliefs, Ryan refused to investigatean anti-military activity that wascharacterized bynonviolent, although illegal, acts. As Ryan exhibited formal disobedience instead of asking to be relieved of the assignment, he invited a formal reply. However, he was not prepared for such severe consequences. Therefore, Ryan required from the FBI to discuss the accommodation of his beliefs. However, this argument was problematic because Title VII requires strict action, without any discussion.

DECISION

The FBI elegantly elaborated its decision. Ryan’s beliefs were not questioned, his deeds were.

REASONING

The decision to fire him came as a result of hisdirect refusalto follow a direct order. Additionally, Ryan refused Swinford’s proposition to swap duties. Therefore, the ground for FBI’s decision was not discrimination on account of religion.

The district judge repeatedAssistant Director Glover’s reasoning that it is hard to create special work within an office where people are required to handle everything that is assigned to them. He stated that moving an agent to another office involves “more than a de minimis cost”, while employers cannot encourage employees who are choosy with regards to their duties.Glover rejected passivity in this case because he firmly believed thatRyan’s disobedience was inconsistent with the FBI’s mission. 

RULE OF LAW

The merit systems protection board and the administrative judge in charge concluded the issue stating that FBI is not responsible for a situation when one’s religious beliefs interfere with the missions of the FBI. The district court that reviewed the record under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2) andconcluded that MSPB’s decision is in accordance with the law and supported by evidence.The court also held a trial on de novo with regard to his complaints under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Casetext,” n.d.).

 

 

 

Reference

Casetext. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://casetext.com/case/ryan-v-department-of-justice-2

Sharing is: CARING

Are you looking for homework writing help? Click on Order Now button below to Submit your assignment details.

Homework Writing Help
We Can Help you with this Assignment right now!
Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)

Are you looking for homework writing help on (Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991))? Well, you can either use the sample paper provided to write your paper or you could contact us today for an original paper. If you are looking for an assignment to submit, then click on ORDER NOW button or contact us today. Our Professional Writers will be glad to write your paper from scratch.

We ensure that assignment instructions are followed, the paper is written from scratch. If you are not satisfied by our service, you can either request for refund or unlimited revisions for your order at absolutely no extra pay. Once the writer has completed your paper, the editors check your paper for any grammar/formatting/plagiarism mistakes, then the final paper is sent to your email.

Writing Features

Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)

Privacy| Confidentiality

Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)

We do not share your personal information with any company or person. We have also ensured that the ordering process is secure; you can check the security feature in the browser. For confidentiality purposes, all papers are sent to your personal email. If you have any questions, contact us any time via email, live chat or our phone number.

Our Clients Testimonials

  • I appreciate help on the assignment. It was hard for me but am good to go now

    Impact of pollution on Environment
  • Am happy now having completed the very difficult assignment

    Creative Message Strategies
  • Your writer did a fine job on the revisions. The paper is now ok

    Ethics: Theory and Practice
  • The paper was so involving but am happy it is done. Will reach you with more assignments

    Title: Privatization in or of America
  • I expected perfection in terms of grammar and I am happy. Lecturer is always on our head but was pleased with my paper. Once again, thanks a lot

    Title: Bundaberg Inquiry
  • The paper looks perfect now, thank to the writer

    Health Care Systems
  • You helped me complete several other tasks as you handled paper. wonna thank you

    Critique Paper on Political Change

Related Articles

Case Studies Sample Paper on Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice Case, 950 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)

Get more from us…

Would you like this sample paper to be sent to your email or would you like to receive weekly articles on how to write your assignments? You can simply send us your request on how to write your paper and we will email you a free guide within 24-36 hours. Kindly subscribe below!

Email Address: support@globalcompose.com