Question 1
Is this scenario considered a disaster? Clearly explain why or why not.
The Liberty International Airport aircraft collapse is a disaster. This is because the indemnity occurred very fast and the jurisdictions were not able to avoid it. As an outcome, the episode evoked a insightful sense of urgency. This went a long way into draining the available the jurisdiction’s human wherewithal, apparatus, supplies and investments.
Moreover, the occasion was uncertain with reverence to its happening and outcome. The hazards that presented the treat were hard to identify. The risks could hardly be measured and the causal interactions between the hazards and disaster incident were poorly understood.
Question 2
Conduct a “SEE” analysis on the concept of mitigation. Use the scenario to provide at least one example of response.
Mitigation is considerable in reducing the costs of prospective debacles of the equivalent nature in an analogous setting (Alexander, 2002). This is done by incorporating planning and mitigations in several arena thereby lowering effects elsewhere. The crash at the airport affected the long-term strategies after the incident as strategies to avoid such occurrences would be implemented. This would affect the effectiveness of the prevention of emergencies and the damages that may be caused by any crashes that could possibly happen at the airport.
Some of the frameworks develop in mitigation involve deterrence, balancing of overheads as well as possessions against the rate of menaces along with the predictable outcome of the alleviation. The information specified by the spectators was imprecise. Everyone who saw the crash occurred was excited to give their personal version of the incident. This is dangerous to the probable healthy being of the port as opportunities to visualize and assess the consequences of the alternative mitigation procedures and plan could be manipulated.
Giving of wrong information leads to uncoordinated, poor communications and lowly maintained risk management structures. Accurate information is significant in adopting structures and policies that mitigate risks by guarding against the development of vulnerabilities that cannot be done away with. Inaccurate information would affect recognition and identification of the cause of the crash and that adoption of the right control measures was warranted. This would go a long way in negatively impacting the elimination of the susceptibility that led to the crash.
Question 3
Conduct a “SEE” analysis on the concept of response. Use the scenario to provide at least one example of response.
Response actions were carried out instantaneously to support the fatalities of the crash. This started when the controllers recognized the jet had crashed. The task force unit worked at minimizing any intimidation to individual existence. Extra forces from the neighborhood in addition to the national strike teams were requested. Firefighters worked hard to put off the fire while the National transportation safety Board (NTSB) conducted investigation on the crash site.
The Red Cross played a critical role in giving details to the families of the crash victims and chaplaincy along with other required help. This played a significant role in combating the false information on a bomb threat that had circulated prior to the crash.
As an ingredient of the rejoinder, geospatial information was gathered. This included an image of the site and plane, processing of the details and conversion of the data. The NTSB collected the air travel information recorder as well as cockpit voice recorder to aid in further examination of the instance.
Question 4
Conduct a “SEE” analysis on the concept of preparedness. Use the scenario to provide at least one example of preparedness.
The Liberty International Airport was effectively prepared for disaster management. The span between the rejoinder period and the latent rate of recovery was really short. The prevailing perils were quickly acknowledged and an arrangement to deal with the requirement for recovery and rejoinder addressed. The plans were developed by combined efforts between different agencies like the Red Cross, task force and the National transportation safety Board among others.
Question 5
Conduct a “SEE” analysis on the concept of recovery. Use the scenario to provide at least one example of recovery.
Procedures were employed to get the port back to its pre-disaster circumstances. The Incident Commander requested for help from the Emergency Operations Center to set up a temporally morgue and provision of ambulances to care facilities. Supplementary staff and assistance was required as the incident’s fatalities were overwhelming. Moreover, measures to counter congestion in the landing field were executed. Proper traffic prototypes were set in position.
Question 6
Conduct a “SEE” analysis on two of the principles of emergency management. Use the scenario to exemplify the principles of emergency management.
The emergency approach used in this particular incident was integrative and comprehensive. The tragedy administrators took onto account all the vulnerabilities, all phases, all stakeholders as well as the relevant effects to adversity. The management ensured that that unanimity of efforts was incorporated at all heights and facets of society. The controllers alerted the Central city 9-1-1 center. The task force Unit, the local new crew, the Red Cross, national transport safety board and the firefighter were incorporated in all the phases of disaster management.
References
Alexander, D. E. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford [Angleterre: Oxford University Press.